Darwin Vs. Pearson :: Natural Selection Essays

The writing of Charles Darwin focuses on the concept of natural selection and its implications on the world race. Darwin understands that allowing jerry-builter people to pass on their genetic shortcomings will last prove to be detrimental. People should have the same reproductive rights and opportunities as all other people. The writing of Karl Pearson also focuses on natural selection and its implications upon the tender race. Pearson, however, believes that the weaker people of society should be forced to die off so as not to pass on their genetic malfeasance. Darwin and Pearson agree on the procedure of natural selection but disagree on how society should utilize the knowledge gained from understanding natural selection.Darwin & Pearson both believe that left unchecked the human race would evolve positively by not allowing unfit people to reproduce. Darwin says, With savages, the weak in body or mind are soon eliminated and those that break commonly exhibit a vigorous stat e of health. Darwin believes that people, without the constraints of society, would allow the weaker elements of their offspring to die off without reproducing. Since people operate in a civilized society, they must tolerate the people who are weaker than they are, until now if it is a detriment to society at large, We must therefore bear the undoubtedly bad effects of the weak surviving and propagating their kind. Karl Pearson believes that the knowledge gained from understanding natural selection should be utilized to stop the human race from declining, I want you to see selection as something which renders the inexorable law of heredity a source of progress, which produces the good through suffering, an infinitely greater good which far outbalances the very obvious pain and evil. Pearson believes that even though it will be hard to do, society must stop allowing inferior people to reproduce.