Ford Pinto Case Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Ford Pinto Case - analyse ExampleThis line of thinking is supported by the first principle in Rawls theory of justness that each person is entitled to the most extensive total system of equal basic liberties (Oyeshile, 2008, p. 65). Among our world liberties, nothing is more basic than the liberty to be secure in ones justifiedly to life and well-being. The intentional deprivation of ones life and health becomes an unethical act and full treatment against the theory of justice of Rawlsianism.Furthermore, in weighing the theoretical costs to benefits, Ford transgressed the principle of Mills utilitarianism which defines value as not merely that which pertains to quantity (pursuant to Benthams hedonism), but that which takes into account the quality, or the honorable making properties which determine value (West, 2006, p. 120). In short, the net benefit in dollars and cents cannot offset the threat to valet de chambre life and health that their design posed.Is American industry at too much risks for lawsuits to remain warlike? Should lawsuits such as the one against Ford be disallowed or limited? Why or wherefore not? Should we try to restrain, in this and other product liability situations, the litigiousness that seems to characterize American life? How might we do this?There are some lawsuits built on superficial claims of product liability, simply because they misrepresent the role played by customer negligence. In the case of the Ford Pinto, however, the customer has a sure and valid actionable claim against Ford. The sale of a product is inclusive of warranties against product defects, and in the Pinto case, an exploding gasconade tank is a huge defect. Furthermore, seen from the Rawlsian difference principle, social and economic inequalities are to be arranged so that they are both to the greatest benefit of the least advantaged. In this case, individual customers are the much